Pi (Snam Suad)

There’s something paradoxical about pi. On the one hand, it represents order, as embodied by the shape of a circle, long held to be a symbol of perfection and eternity. On the other hand, pi is unruly, disheveled in appearance, its digits obeying no obvious rule, or at least none that we can perceive. Pi is elusive and mysterious, forever beyond reach. It is defined as the unattainable limit of a never-ending process.

Steven Strogatz, Infinite Powers, 34.

How can there
be no rule,
pattern, rhyme––
paradox––
for how through
and round mesh?
Untamed, known,
Fathomless.

7-12-2019

What is a Snam Suad?

Advertisements

The Art of Hanging On (Kloang)

Poem-a-Day Challenge #12: Art of __________

It’s not science     to keep
Holding; gravity     expends
All its energy      to pull
Down, experience     the fall in full.

Science calculates     friction,
Mass, height, inertia:     Your fate
Computed, vision      clearing.
Cold data awaits,     no help appearing.

Hanging on is art:      to see
Hope when all is bleak,     apart
From math, data. Be     stronger
With gifted love, thwart     gravity longer.

4-12-2019

What is a Kloang?

Prompt

Wonder Wanderings 5: Light is Smart

Wonder Wanderings is a periodic blog series at Melody+Theology, where I point out fascinating things I’ve come across in my reading wanderings. These amazing things show us an amazing God and yet another reason to marvel at His power and creativity.

refracted-1525452-639x852.jpgSnell’s Law describes how light rays bend when they pass from air into water, as they do when the sun shines into a swimming pool. Light moves more slowly in water, … and it bends accordingly to minimize its travel time. Similarly, light bends when it travels from air into glass or plastic, as when it refracts through your eyeglass lenses.

The eerie point is that light behaves as if it were considering all possible paths and then taking the best one. Nature—cue the them from The Twilight Zone—somehow knows calculus.

— Steven Strogatz, The Joy of x: A Guided Tour of Math, from One to Infinity, 137.

2015 Reading List: Love and Math

Frenkel, Edward. Love and Math: The Heart of Hidden Reality.

I discovered Numberphile back when the -1/12 video went viral. In the course of browsing their videos, I came across Love and Math, since Dr. Frenkel is one of the mathematicians consulted in the videos. The purpose of the book was billed as showing how math-haters can love math, so I thought I’d give it a shot.

I didn’t particularly care for this book. It’s half biography, half this-is-the-math-my-life’s-work-is-based-on, and my reaction to the book splits evenly down that line of demarcation. I found the biographical sections fascinating and compelling writing; I found the math sections almost impenetrably complex.

Dr. Frenkel is a native Russian, whose Jewish heritage precluded him from admission to Moscow’s highest university with the best math program. The stories of institutionalized racism and anti-Semitism are heartbreaking. The genuine affection and appreciation that Dr. Frenkel shows toward his mentors and teachers is strikingly beautiful, and many times I found myself moved by his sentiments and longing to be that kind of teacher myself.

But the math. The math that’s typically taught in US education systems is the ancient, established-for-centuries variety; Dr. Frenkel’s aim in the book is to show that there’s more to math than the quadratic equations and differential calculus that many of us suffered through in high school and college. I’m sure the modern math he describes is incredible, but I have to take his word for it. He valiantly attempts to describe and explain what’s going on in the various problems and projects he’s working on, but it’s tough sledding to read through. He even assumes in the introduction that you’ll take multiple readings, going back to dive deeper into the heavy math and footnotes on subsequent trips through the book. I’m not sure I’m up for it, honestly.

It’s highly likely that my disappointment with the book lies more in misplaced expectations than the actual content of the book itself. I wish I could combine the robust, Trinitarian orthodoxy and clarity of Vern Poythress with the compelling narrative of Edward Frenkel. That would be an amazing book on math. Alas, neither Redeeming Mathematics nor Love & Math ultimately satisfied.